DNA stuff confuses me. Its so complicated. That’s why i asked Gina about why there is differing steps of distance from the descendants of 3 of the sons of 1689 William. Exact match or one step from two sons, but 2 steps from another son at 37 markers. I guess that’s why more indepth testing is needed, to see how those hold up at more markers. As I understand it, some folks can be an exact match at 12 or 37, but drops down at 67 or 111. Then to confuse the picture even more, some mutations are rare and if present mean a relationship even though the distance maybe a 2 or 3. We need to win the lottery and then hire a genealogist and a geneticist to to solve our puzzle!!!!
↧